I've never owned a pair of Vans. In the 90s when I was wearing skate shoes, I was an Airwalk guy.
That changed when I was looking for a new pair of work shoes. I work in an office environment, but it is a little casual, and I can get away with wearing sneakers. I was looking for a replacememt of the Adidas Superstar IIs that I have. I liked those but they were a little narrow for me and the leather and rubber get hot (I own three pairs of them in different colors, so I am an Adidas guy). I had bought a pair of brown hemp Sambas to be my brown shoes, and I was looking for an all-black version of those since I love those so much.
I looked and looked and couldn't find a pair that was all black except for making a customized version on the Adidas website. Needless to say I wasn't to happy with the idea of dropping ninety five dollars on a canvas shoe, so I actually went to the mall to find a shoe store. I tried these on at my normal size, and they felt a bit loose, so I backed down a size and at the store they felt great. I'm still getting used to them and breaking them in right now. The canvas wears differently than most sneakers, so you feel the friction as your foot moves inside the shoe as it holds onto you sock. Or perhaps I just should have gone a half size up because my foot is wider than it is long.
There's also the fact that the sole is thinner than some other shoes, so when I wear pants that are fine with thicker-soled shoes, the back cuff of my pants keep catching on the heel. Overall, they are comfortable and look good. I don't want to sound too critical, I do like them. In fact I only thought of writing a review because I was looking for more Vans on line. They're just a little different.
August 15, 2014
August 9, 2014
Avoid Hiassen's Strip Tease
I have often seen Hiassen pop up in my Amazon recommendations,
but I had never read any though for whatever reason. The work seemed compared to smart and
literate men like that of Robbins or Moore, so Amazon kept telling me to check
this guy out. I never did until just recently, when this book was part of a
Humble Bundle collection that I bought.
I’m not sure Striptease may have been the best introduction
to his work. I couldn’t figure out what I didn’t like about it until I was
about halfway through. It is the basis
of the derided Demi Moore movie of the same name. In spite of the movie coming
out when I was a teenage boy and therefore being part of the prime audience, I
never saw the movie (ok, maybe I saw some of the scenes). That wasn’t even the issue, though it did
make me think of the book in a slightly different light. The problem is that a
lot of the details are too clever by half and make the book unrealistic. For
example, the main character is a stripper with a heart of gold. The only reason
she dances is because she needs the money to fight for her kid. Also: The judge
on the case often goes to the place where she works. The judge also is the only
judge in family court history to give a child to a father who has no means of
support and has several convictions but those were expunged because he works as
an informant for some police officers. The father’s real means of support? He
steals wheelchairs and resells them.
It’s quite ridiculous. Then add that the main driver of the
plot is an over-sexed politician... never mind that part is real. Basically it
reminds me of the worst ridiculousness that can be found in the books of Chuck
Palahniuk. They are the same kind of details that I thought were clever and I
slipped into my undergraduate fiction. I have to give Hiassen the benefit of the
doubt though. This book is 25 years old. Perhaps he got better. This book,
however, is to be avoided.
July 29, 2014
An (un)Interesting Drug: The Graphic Novel by Manning and Wieszczyk
So you’re a genius who flamed out of college. Then this guy
comes into your life, telling you that you are the guy who invented a time
travel drug. What do you do? Since your sister died when you were younger you
want to make that invention so you can change the past so she doesn’t die.
Simple, right. At least it makes for….”An Interesting Drug”.
Bottom line here is that I wanted to like the book, but I
didn’t. The drawings were too busy, the palette is a succession of monochromes
(though they are for a reason, to show the different time periods. However
there is a heavy reliance on this ugly mustard yellow that doesn’t work for
me).
Then there’s the time travel. The drug is one sort of time
travel, but the “bad” guy figures out another sort of time travel – it all gets
really distractingly hand-wavey there.
Finally, crazy plot point that annoyed me. Main character
goes back to school, and he is allowed to run drug tests through his own lab at
school on humans. And he’s an undergraduate. The lab supervisor and the
Standards & Ethics Committee were all asleep at the switch. Meh.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)